Wilbert Smith Archives Files Box 1130 16 1130-16-p004

Document Text (OCR)

i il MUFORL minus 10 or 20 percent. But even if they were off | and size (a factor of two: for example, perhaps the o Fat 75,000 ft. high and 15 ft. in diameter) there would be nomenon or manmade device which could explain the si; teresting to note that the 30 ft. size calculated Mr. the same as the calculated size of the object seen (oy, exactly a year earlier, if Moore's object had been at an 100,000 ft. A reasonable question to ask is, why didn't Elterman m successful triangulation? Perhaps...